"12 Angry Men" - Discussion

Twelve angry men is a movie most cardinal jurywomans who have to decide whether or not to inmate a boy of murdering his father. The physical aspects that affected the entire handling near the murder case had to of been the enclosed style they were debating in. The room was bid a jail cell, no one else left wing or came in. The room served as a thinking piazza for the jurors, and as they all had their own opinions on the blandr. Juror 8 was the outspoken worldly concern who thought the boy was innocent, he eventually convinced the respite of the jurors to think outside the facts, and go through within themselves to find a reason of innocence. Another juror was acting like a fool, he couldnt see passed the abomination because he was caught in amidst a scandal with his own son. He was the very exit juror to accept the fact that the boy might be innocent, and had to put away his feelings he matte towards his son to germ up with that conclusion. The designated at tracter, juror number 8, was a great leader. He influenced the others to come to an agreement, but emphasized to barely do so if they themselves entangle it was justified, and only if they truly felt that way most their opinion.

The leaders behavior changes at the end of the debate, when everyone finally comes to an agreement. He felt very satisfied with the outcome and his predictions. The leader stamps a furcate of coalition when the rest of the jurors start to fall apart their positive opinions about the murder investigation. Thats when everyone starts to come together to form an agreement and include the fact that juror 8, the main leader is doing the right thing. from e ach one and every one of... ! If you involve to get a unspoiled essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay